Hi,
We replaced the different terms in the FT-150 specs by a single "signal noise" spec.
If you look at the updated specifications you will see that :
- the FT-150 has a 0.5 N signal noise
- FT-300 has 0.5 N in Z axis and 1.2 N in X and Y.
Personally I would go with the FT-300, it's just a better fit on the UR and a bit more versatile.
Do you think the 1.2 vs 0.5 N in X and Y is a limiting factor for that customer ?
Hi there,
I have a customer interested in using a Universal Robots UR5 for a testing application. He inserts a gauge housing into a hole at about 30N force, then moves the gauge itself within the hole and any resistance indicates a defect. We think that either the FT150 or the FT300 would be a good choice. When would you suggest one instead of the other?
Also, I see from the FT150 instruction manual that its effective resolution is 0.2N but I do not see an instruction manual for the FT300 or any resolution data on its specification sheet. Do you have any information on its resolution?
Thanks