I guess the short answer is we’ve done about all of what you mentioned. The thing that we constantly strive for is to start as simple as we can, prove that the main task can be accomplished and then add complexity as we deem it necessary to increase unattended run time.
Ryan_Weaver
@Etienne_Samson - I'm not sure I've ever seen an application unwrapping parts, but the bin-picking scenario does come up. There are no tools on the market today that will reliably fit any part that we can just strap onto a robot to do bin picking. They are all ~50-90% functional.
It would be great if we had some kind of "Erector Set" kit (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erector_Set in case you didn't have these in QC growing up) that could build feeders for common part shapes or sizes. It's probably asking too much, but if we could feed 80% of the parts we came across in the field, we would undoubtedly sell more solutions.
Hi Pros!
We have all experienced problem around part feeding to the robot, most of the time it's the blocker in our projects. Several solutions are available on the market, using jigs & fixtures, using bowl feeder, vibraiting table, using 2D vision, 3D vision etc.
I'd like to hear from you today is how do you select them, what do you use, when and why. Have you tried doing your own? Do you use standard solutions? How do you choose to go with vision or not? What are your biggest challenge with part feeding?
@matthewd92 @Enric @Ryan_Weaver I'll tag you guys since you are my heroes but I know a lot of people will have to share on this.
Merci :smiley: